The Blog Hawgs

Sports, Politics, Pop Culture, and Other Stuff … But Mostly Sports

Blue Hog Political Roundup

Posted by Brett Kincaid on September 23, 2010

Greetings, Blog Hawgs Nation! I’m Jeff Woodmansee from the progressive Blue Hog Report political blog, and am excited about the opportunity Adam and Brett have afforded me here to bring to you a weekly rundown of Arkansas political news. Football season is in full swing, but so is the political season, and I hope to keep you in-the-know with the many important national and state races ramping up as we head towards November.

The Rundown

Senate candidates Blanche Lincoln and John Boozman are out with new TV ads following their heated Talk Business/Fox 16 debate from September 10. In the ad, Blanche uses what her campaign has deemed a “gotcha moment” from the challenger in that debate where Boozman says he’s “excited about looking at the fair tax” [Boozman’s disastrous idea of a 23% national sales tax across the board on the goods we buy, meaning the middle class and those in poverty would be forced to pay the same level of taxes as the ultra-rich – a “disastrous” idea that somehow polls fairly well in this state.] Boozman, in turn, hits Lincoln with the tried-and-true GOP method of tying her to President Obama and House Speaker Pelosi, this time via two good ol’ boys chatting while they fish.

Also from the Senate race: Incumbent Lincoln, still trailing badly to Mr. Boozman, has called for a series of debates to take place between now and election day, and wants to include Tea Party favorite Trevor Drown to enter the fray, though thus far he has garnered only around 5% support in recent polling.

Despite the tide of public opinion seemingly ushering in the repeal of the controversial “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” program regarding allowing gays to openly serve in the U.S. military, Democrats favoring repeal could not get the 60 votes they needed to include the measure in a defense spending bill introduced on Tuesday, largely because both Arkansas Senators Lincoln and Pryor sided with the unified senate Republicans on the matter. Lincoln said she objected to the limits on debate and “needed a chance to offer amendments that would benefit her state.” In an official statement, Pryor said “there needs to be a genuine and honest effort to craft a defense bill that senators from both parties can support, because supporting our troops should not ever be a partisan issue.” For such a straight-forward proposition, one can’t help but wonder what (if any) crafting will be done or if this issue is revisited anytime soon. AR-02 congressional candidate Joyce Elliott is the only federal candidate from the two major parties in Arkansas to say she would definitely vote to repeal DADT.

Speaking of Rep. Elliott, who faces a major uphill climb in her tilt against George W. Bush/Karl Rove protégé Timmy Griffin, she has thus far been hesitant to take to the fight to Griffin in the manner many progressives have longed to see (and feel is her only shot at victory). She did, however, try to hit Griffin on his support of a “30% flat tax” while at a debate at the UALR Bowen School of Law (you smell a theme from Dems yet?), yet turned right around to not only miss a critical opportunity to highlight Griffin’s misdealings in the Bush-era fired U.S. attorneys scandal, but to say her “campaign has never been focused on what Mr. Griffin did or did not do in terms of receiving his post at the U.S. Attorney’s office,” nor would it in the future. You might want to change that “Safe Griffin” line to “Slam Dunk Griffin,” AR-02 pollers.

Former Governor Mike Huckabee was in town over the weekend and appeared at a GOP fundraiser in Little Rock’s River Market. While there, he gave an official endorsement to Republican Rep. Mark Martin, who, despite thus far running a very lackluster campaign on the ideas front, the most recent Arkansas News/Stephens Media poll has ahead of Democratic opponent Pat O’Brien 45%-34%.

What’s the Word?

Columnist John Brummett examines a Talk Business poll released last week testing state party identification versus name identification – and fears this year’s trend towards the GOP is more than just a passing moment, but rather a political earthquake reconfiguring our landscape for years to come.

My partner-in-crime Matt Campbell from Blue Hog Report – the newly minted progressive voice to the Arkansas Election Line – gives his analysis on how effective AR-01 congressional candidates Chad Causey and Rick Crawford have been in using online social media during the course of their respective campaigns.

Jeff Woodmansee is a husband, daddy, law librarian, political activist, and writer from Sherwood, AR. In addition to following the Hogs, this Missouri transplant roots on the St. Louis Cardinals and Rams. The opinions he expresses here each week in his “Arkansas Political Roundup” are just that – his opinions – and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Blog Hawgs writing team. Jeff is also a contributing editor and writer for the Blue Hog Report, the leading progressive political news blog in the state.

13 Responses to “Blue Hog Political Roundup”

  1. Adam Butler said

    Great update, Jeff W.–I hope that in the coming weeks the news is better for Arkansans. I’m not holding my breath.

    I can’t believe you mentioned Mr. Boozman without the obligatory reference to the fact that he PLAYED FOR THE RAZORBACKS. jk….but seriously, Mr. Boozman–enough. We get it. You played for some bad Razorback teams–so did Jermaine Brooks–it doesn’t mean he should be a Senator (but I bet he would support bills he sponsored).

    I love Ms. Elliott, but she’s making what is becoming a classic Dem faux pas–assuming incorrectly that tge people want a clean campaign. They don’t. They want to know how awful Mr. Griffin is–and there’s plenty to work with there. Just my $.02. Anyway, I enjoyed the report. Thanks.

  2. Maukavelli said

    Legitimate political question here, and I credit it more to Jon Stewart’s observation than anything: When did the US political culture get hijacked by the extremists? Stewart’s call for a “Rally to Restore Sanity” makes a lot of sense, and also is quite funny (and with Stewart and Colbert, it’s hard to tell what’s serious and what’s not.). Seems that the extreme 10 to 20% of political wings get all the attention, while the rest of us centrists continue to get left out of everything.

    Has it always been this way in a dual-party (or more) system, and it’s just “enhanced” more b/c of the 24/353 (I take 12 days off for college football) news cycle? Or has the extremists actually taken over all the issues, leaving the middle whim to their causes/ideas?

    • Kris W. Clinton said

      Well, Maukavelli, the American public has done a wonderful job over the past 18 years of electing Presidents who were not divisive and were (and are) so willing to lean over the railing to the other side.

  3. WHAAAAAT?!?!?! says Kris (impersonating Moe Syzslak) said

    JOHN BOOZMAN PLAYED FOR THE RAZORBACKS!!!!!!!!!!?????????!!!!!!!!!!! That’s awesome! I had no idea. He’s got my vote. I mean, if J.C. Watts can be such an amazing member of the House because he played football for OU then surely Boozman will be the same way.

  4. […] has a new weekly political roundup at Blog Hawgs. You want a taste? Oh, I’ll feed you, baby bird. Columnist John Brummett examines a Talk […]

  5. Jeff W. said

    Your take is pretty sound, but make no mistake: it’s still those in “the middle” and “centrists” that will largely dictate the outcome of our elections. President Obama certainly fired up progressives, but he won such a resounding victory because less-ideological voters in the middle sided with him as being the better choice for digging us out of our economic mess and tackling the big issues of the day in a more bi-partisan manner than seen in recent years. However, after not clearly communicating some of the administration’s early achievements, allowing nut-jobs to take over and dictate the healthcare reform debate, and being handed the worst economic situation any newly-elected president has seen since FDR, it’s clear this “middle” now favors anti-incumbents across the board, which happens to be the GOP at the moment. As for Arkansas — whew, where to start — you may be seeing a true transformation from the old southern Dems we’re used to voting for to completely unqualified GOP candidates winning solely because of party identification. For me, looking at the climate right now, I certainly think there is a tremendous racial undertone to the fiery rhetoric and sentiment we’ve seen as a reaction to some of the president’s policies.

    • Kris Bobama said

      “For me, looking at the climate right now, I certainly think there is a tremendous racial undertone to the fiery rhetoric and sentiment we’ve seen as a reaction to some of the president’s policies.”

      No doubt, Jeff W. Especially since President Obama is a muslim who canceled National Prayer Day, refused to place his hand on the Bible, doesn’t wear the American flag on his jacket, took the American flag off of Air Froce One, has already filed proposed legislation to repeal the 2nd Amendment and wants to remove “Under God We Trust” from our money.

    • Dan K said

      Jeff and others,

      I take issue with the assertion that if you don’t like what President Obama is doing then you must be racially motivated. Do I think he is a racist? Very likely. It sure would seem so, due to the Pigford case, but it may just be that he is a political opportunist and reparations will get the the progressive, bleeding heart vote. But nonetheless his policies are just to the left of most extreme leftists. That is the objection. Now you may disagree with those who object to policies that lead toward a police state, but that is the foundation of the movement against Obama and his policies, not race. (note: I cannot exclude racism as a factor in individual people’s position, but I am convinced it is not a significant part of the movement. I mean the guy got elected President of the United States, for crying out loud. Does that mean nothing anymore). Alas, all you progressives that believe goverment can save us all, eliminate poverty, catalize production, and protect the people. You will get your shot at living under total governmental control. Both parties in this country are very progressive. One is a little more so than the other, but both are headed in the same direction (i.e. more government control). So have no fear one day our children, grand-children, or great-grandchildren will have the privilege of living in the world that their predecessors (progressive egalitarians) worked so hard (blogging, voting, oppressing through social programs, and indoctrinating our youth)to achieve. This Dream is: A country where the citizenry is totally dependent on the State for food, health care, protection, housing, clothing, energy, etc. As long as we have a wonderful hearted, selfless, inspiring leader; it will all be OK. But the only way to be the leader of this New World would be to take the position by force, because elections will have become obsolete. So unless this Great Leader (like an Obama) will rise up by force you will be stuck with what we often call a “tyrannical dictator”. But I’m just a crazy nut that thinks that when people ignore history then history repeats itself. It’s totally impossible and is only a fictional scare tactic used by those who study history. I am confident that Progressives will get what they want, I just hope I’m wrong about what that means for this Country and our posterity. I tried to keep this brief.

  6. BradinBenton said

    The football reads are so much better than the political hackery above. Y’all need to stick to football and leave the politics to CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc. I really enjoy the football stuff. Just saying…

    • Adam Butler said

      That’s interesting, Brad, because I like your comments a lot better when you agree with me.

      Seriously, though, Jeff W. runs his own site and is a big boy. I’ll let him take up for himself. But, “hackery” sure seems like an ad hominem to me.

      And, while his bio, and the post, clearly state his column is special to Bloghawgs, our banner also clearly states this is a blog about “Sports, politics, pop culture and other stuff..but mostly sports”.

      And, I think that’s a pretty fair assessment of our content. As to what we should stick to, I think it’s like anything else. If you don’t like it, skip it. Your Mouse isn’t a Quija Board….just sayin’.

      Oh, and thanks for reading. We welcome all kinds of opinions.

      • Jeff W. said

        Thanks, Adam — and yes, not only am I a “big boy,” I’m a big REDHEADED boy, so clearly I’m more conditioned to scorn and ridicule than you’re average fella. 😉

        No, seriously, I like the feedback, even when readers disagree, and would much prefer people to react to what I write as opposed to ignore it. That said, my goal here is to provide this particular audience — you diehard Razorback fans who may/may not be deeply interested in AR politics — with quick hits on the past week’s political news, along with a little of my commentary and reaction in between. Realizing that sports are one of the few non-partisan places of battle we have left in this country, and the awesome blog Brett and Adam run here is SPORTS first…THEN other stuff, I’ll always tailor my entries to strengthen BlogHawgs.com’s content, not distract from its overall mission.

        BlogHawgs readers should know they can check out bluehogreport.com for long-winded rants, no-holds-barred progressive viewpoints, and passionate-yet-civilized debate within our comment sections.

      • BradinBenton said

        Well, we’ve got two things in common. We’re both big (6’3″, 210) red-headed fellows, and we both love the HOGS.
        I am new to this blog and hadn’t seen any political commentary in my previous visits, so this came as a surprise to me. Hence my comment.
        Oh, and just in case you care, I’m also a progressive. I believe that the government should become “progressively” smaller and less involved (read intrusive) in its citizens lives. I don’t like Obama, Pelozi, Reid, McCain, Palin, Boxer, or Fiengold (sp?). I guess according to your logic that makes me racist, misogynist, anti-semitic, anti-veteran, and just plain intolerant. Anyway, I really love the football stuff. GO HOGS GO!!!!! BEAT BAMA!!!!!

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.